FnF News
🇺🇸 FNF News | U.S. Politics & Civil Movements
Published: June 16, 2025
By: Khadija Khan
“Protest by Design: No Kings Movement Emerges as Rapid-Fire Response to Trump’s Project 2025 Playbook”
As the U.S. military paraded down the streets of Washington, D.C. to celebrate its 250th anniversary, an entirely different kind of force was assembling in alleyways, overpasses, and public parks — the No Kings Protest Movement, a spontaneous, self-organizing guerilla protest described by its participants as “a decentralized answer to centralized tyranny.”
On the surface, it looked like a culture clash between patriotism and rebellion. But beneath the imagery was a deeper political current: a grassroots uprising explicitly aimed at Donald Trump, his authoritarian impulses, and the Project 2025 framework that activists say threatens American democracy.
Born of Authoritarian Celebration
The parade — complete with armored vehicles, marching formations, fighter jet flyovers, and a nationally televised speech by former President Donald Trump — was held on June 14, Trump’s 79th birthday.
“You don’t choose your birthday for a military parade unless you want the symbolism,” said Dr. Emerson Bellamy, a political psychologist at Georgetown University. “That date wasn’t an accident. It was a coronation in everything but name.”
Protestors from the No Kings collective say that was exactly the point — and why they responded immediately and without central planning.
“We don’t need permits. We don’t need six months of logistics,” said one organizer who gave only the name Cam. “We respond when authoritarianism flexes. That’s our strength — we show up fast, furious, and unfiltered.”
Project 2025: The Protest Blueprint
At the core of the movement’s anger is Project 2025, a sweeping 920-page blueprint for the next Republican administration drafted by the Heritage Foundation. The document calls for:
- The termination of career civil servants deemed “disloyal.”
- Full executive control over the Justice Department.
- Aggressive restructuring of departments such as Education, Homeland Security, and the FBI.
- Political loyalty tests across government branches.
While not authored by Trump himself, Project 2025 has been publicly embraced by several of his key allies and mirrors much of his rhetoric about the “deep state,” the need for “absolute presidential control,” and eliminating regulatory “roadblocks.”
“It’s not just a think tank exercise. It’s a real plan. Trump has already started using it as a guide,” said NYU political historian Dr. Loretta Manning. “The No Kings movement understands this better than Congress seems to.”
The Protest: Disorganized by Design
Unlike traditional protest movements, No Kings operates like a digital swarm. No single organization or nonprofit backs it. Its calls to action spread through encrypted platforms like Signal, Telegram, and Matrix, often using QR codes, memes, or one-word prompts.
- In Minneapolis, protestors blocked an intersection with barricades made of bike racks and trash bins.
- In Denver, a crowd of roughly 300 moved silently through downtown, holding blank signs.
- In Atlanta, a flash mob burned copies of the Project 2025 draft in front of a Fox News affiliate office.
Despite the lack of preparation time, the movement’s turnout stunned even longtime organizers of leftist actions. According to police reports, over 40 cities reported coordinated demonstrations within 24 hours of the parade announcement.
“That’s how insurgency works,” said protestor Cam. “You don’t match power with power. You exhaust it. You expose its fear.”
Critics Call It Anti-American, Activists Call It Anti-Fascist
Unsurprisingly, Republican figures and conservative media slammed the protests.
“These people are anarchists,” said Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) on Fox & Friends. “They hate the military, they hate this country, and they’re organized by radicals who want to destroy the Constitution.”
But civil liberties groups like the ACLU and Freedom House disagreed, pointing out that the right to protest authoritarian overreach is itself a cornerstone of American values.
“The irony is that these protestors are defending the very freedoms the parade claims to honor,” said ACLU spokesperson Natalie Dawson.
“Weak Men Need Parades”: Trump and the Authoritarian Aesthetic
For many in the No Kings movement, Trump’s affinity for fascist optics is no longer subtle. His praise of leaders like Vladimir Putin, Kim Jong-un, and Viktor Orbán — all known for tightly choreographed displays of power — has become a frequent rallying cry among protestors.
“He needs others to show what he himself is not,” said Jules R., a protestor in D.C. “This whole thing — tanks, flags, loyalty pledges — is about masking weakness with fear.”
Observers note the difference in effort between the two sides:
- The parade required months of planning, permits, and government coordination.
- The protests took shape in mere hours, coordinated loosely online with almost no formal infrastructure.
“This is the asymmetry of protest in the digital age,” said sociologist Dr. Kiera Molina. “When governments move like slow machinery, decentralized actors can outmaneuver and outmessage them. That’s what we saw this weekend.”
Final Thoughts: A New Kind of Resistance
The No Kings protests are not polished. They are not funded. They are not safe. But they are undeniably powerful in their ability to respond in real time to acts of state power, especially when that power is wrapped in flags and fireworks.
Whether Trump runs in 2028 or not, the symbolism of June 14, 2025, may mark a new turning point in American protest culture.
“It’s not about Trump the man,” said Cam. “It’s about every system that enables men like him to rule through fear, flags, and parades. That’s what we resist. And we’ll keep resisting—every damn time.”
Sources:
- Heritage Foundation: Project 2025 Draft (2024)
- ACLU Press Release, June 2025
- Interview with NYU Political Historian Dr. Loretta Manning
- Telegram and Signal channels affiliated with protest collectives
- Fox News, CNN, and Reuters national coverage archives